An experimental test of two policies to increase donations to public projects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Contribution to Journal)peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper uses lab-in-the-field experiments and theory to explore why people give money to gov-ernments. We assume that giving is motivated by outcome–oriented or consequentialist norms, andconditional on (a) others’ behavior and (b) beliefs about how competent the government is. The evidencefrom a lab experiment in Peru is in line with this. On the other hand, we analyze the potential effectsof two policies to increase giving, observing that less people give zero if they are informed about (i)two specific government projects (a subway line and a children’s hospital) or (ii) that some well-knownOlympic medalist pays punctually her taxes, according to public information released by the Peruviantax Agency. Our findings contribute to a burgeoning literature on tax morale and are arguably relevantto understand taxpayers’ non-selfish reasons to pay (or evade) their taxes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105892
JournalInternational Review of Law and Economics
Volume62
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Donations
  • Peer effects
  • Public projects
  • Social norms
  • Tax morale

COAR

  • Article

OECD Category

  • Economía, Negocios

Ulima Repository Category

  • Ciencias sociales / Política

Ulima Repository Subject

  • Donaciones
  • Donations
  • Proyectos de inversión pública
  • Public investment projects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental test of two policies to increase donations to public projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this